There’s a lot of noise on the web (or Google at least) when trying to search for a solution to using a Mini’s DVI output on LCD TV’s. Typically they recommend using DisplayConfigX  or SwitchResX to tweak your display modelines, timing, resolution, and just generally dive deeper than I like  into display configuration. My solution was MUCH simpler.

My television is a Samsung 46″ LCD (LN46A539P1F). It has 3 HDMI inputs, but one is specifically intended to be used for PCI DVI input converted to HDMI.  It also provides a VGA DSUB input which works perfectly with a Mac Mini’s miniDVI->VGA apapter, but the point here is to get direct digital signal without converting to analog.

The Mac Mini has a miniDVI output and is packaged with a miniDVI->DVI adapter, so to get a signal into the TV, you’ll need a DVI->HDMI or miniDVI->HDMI adapter. I bought both from Monoprice as they are very inexpensive and either works fine.

Once you have the apdapter on and the HDMI cable connected to the TV, the Mac will recognize that it is displaying on an HDTV and will recommend 720p (1280×720 resoution) or 1080p (1920×1080 resolution). However, you will now most likely see that your output is either too small on the screen (has a few inches of black border around the picture)  or is too big (extends beyond the screen). If it’s too big, you have Overscan enabled in your Displays preference pane. If not, you should enable Overscan.

Now, on your TV, go to the Menu:

• Choose “Picture” (should be first option)
• Choose “Picture Options” (near the bottom of list)
• Choose “Size” (will have options like 4:3, 16:9, and Just Scan)
• Choose “Just Scan”
• Close Menu

Bam! Your display should now be just right!

Today I noticed he had a link to an excellent slideshow resource provided by Dave Ramsey.

So, go watch how you and I can both Drive Free and Retire Rich.

Click here to view the embedded video.

There was one dude on site who managed to catch this awesome snapshot!

Jive Launches the SBS Rocket!

I talked with several friends who are way more “camera geeky” than I am… I’m pretty ignorant of photography for the most part, but I wouldn’t mind learning a bit more. So I only had a few basic criteria:

• Pretty decent low-light (indoor) photos
• Use AA batteries (I really like having easy access to spares in a pinch)
• Some advanced features so I can learn more if I get motivated

Not required but very nice to have items were:

• Big optical zoom (because its really nice)
• Viewfinder (because sometimes glare just makes LCDs useless)
• Semi-fast flash recharge

It was soon obvious that I was looking for an “Advanced Point and Shoot” for which a few of the top players were Nikon’s P80 and Canon’s SX10 IS. I have some friends who are die-hard Nikon fans and others who are die-hard Canon fans, so this was tricky.

The P80 was a bit more inexpensive, and Pro Photo Supply in Portland, is primarily (though by no means completely) a Nikon shop, so they packed some extra value with their Nikons, including a free 2-year add-on to the already present 1-year warranty, and a basic leather camera case. The biggest single downside for me was that it uses a custom Li-ion rechargeable, and one of my bigger criteria was to use AA batteries. However, it is pretty light, has a nice interface, and seemed good overall with an 18x zoom and a nice wide mode too (27mm – 486mm range).

The SX10 IS is the new version of the S5 IS (and S3 IS before it); I’ve got friends with both the S5 and S3, so I’ve had the chance to play with them before. Both friends are nearly fanatical about these cameras, so they were hard to ignore. The SX10 cost about $60 more than the P80, but very importantly, it is powered by AA batteries. It also boasts a nice wide mode and an even larger 20x zoom (28mm – 560mm range). This one is a bit heaver than the P80, but has a nice LCD that actually pivots out and can be turned around to protect the screen and save battery, or be used to aid in self portraiting. One downside is that it doesn’t have a provided lens cap keeper string, but I should be able to pick one up very cheaply (Pro Photo was out of stock).

Both cameras were very nice, but the SX10 fit my criteria more closely, so that’s what I went with. Of course, I’ve left out the internal battle I had one whether or not I should get an “advanced” Point and Shoot like this. I figured I could get a much cheaper small P&S with a 4x zoom, and perhaps someday later explore the SLR world. But I think I’m happy. My biggest concern was that the wife would find it too bulky to mess with, but she seems to like it quite well! It IS after all a Point and Shoot and has all the preset auto and scene modes to make things as simple as you want.

To test low-light shots, I took the following three pictures as soon as I got home tonight. I don’t think they do the camera justice, but I’m a rookie and I’m just demonstrating some fun differences I found.

All three were taken at ISO 800. I think the images are a bit noisy due to the higher ISO, but bleh, I’m new and playing around. This is my sons room and crib, no lights on with a half-open door letting in some fairly dim incandescent light.

The first image is auto-mode with the flash and auto white balance on. I really want to learn to avoid the flash (or maybe just when to use it), as it almost always makes weird shadows and strange highlights. Anyway… here it is.

This second is in aperture-priority mode set to f2.8, with the flash off and auto white balance on. It’s very obvious this is a dark room in this shot.

My next thought was “I think I could make this photo better by setting the white balance.” So I did just that. I used evaluative white balance to set the the wall as the white but kept it at f2.8 priority and no flash. I then snapped the same picture again. Amazing! It’s hard to tell the room is even dark!

I know I’m going to have lots of fun with this camera. Though it doesn’t yet support the Digic 4 processor, I’m looking forward to seeing what the CHDK addon firmware will do for me when it does. Plus, I look forward to lots of fun learning more about photography in general. And the most important thing; the wife seems to like it!

It’s cool to see good feedback on the company I work for and our flagship product, Clearspace. Of course, since I’m friends with Matt (mentioned in the post), it’s nice to know he’s doing a good job. Gotta keep him on his toes! D00d!

This article makes it vey clear. Check out the photo.

The last week has brought massive flooding to much of the mid-west, Des Moines and Iowa City included. There’s been national news coverage, and locally its the only thing happening. Massive flood work and relief efforts are underway everywhere. There was a similar devastating flood in 1993. This flood is worse, but at least there’s been a lot of warning. A lot of people had days to prepare, evacuate, move belongings to safety, etc.

My family and I are safe and well. My in-laws had a flooded basement due to the exceptionally high water table, but that’s manageable. My parents’ church building is completely under water, but they were able to move everything in the building to a safe location before the flooding hit them. At their home they don’t have internet or phone, but they do have power, and the cell phone is providing basic email for now.

My sister has posted flikr photos of the flood in the Iowa City area, as has her boyfriend Joe in this blog post.
The Iowa City Press-Citizen has coverage of the flood in the Iowa City area (link to front page as the “photos” link isn’t working).

In Des Moines, two friends have posted flood pics: Colin and Mark.
The Des Moines Register has photos and coverage of the flood in the Des Moines area.

I’ve posted a few of our photos here.